Corporatism In this case the interaction between elites and masses is legal and legitimate. But probably the main sign of belonging to the ruling elite is the presence of higher, government positions in society, political structures, economy, military complex, culture, etc. Another sign of the elite is the origin and education. So, in the Western political elite supports priority social origin, indicating initial opportunities, conditions and guidelines for primary and secondary socialization, in contrast to Russia, where the place of this factor takes prior relationship with the nomenklatura elite and the commitment of the leaders - the head. strator. In other words, the corporate origins. American political scientist F. Schmitter considers corporatism "as one of the possible mechanisms for associations mediate between the interests of its members (individuals, families, businesses, local communities, groups) and various contractors (primarily government and governmental bodies). " Corporatism fits well into the democratic rule of law, as evidenced by the spread of this phenomenon in countries with developed democratic institutions, and with significant relapses - in unconsolidated democracy. Particularly damaging it manifests itself in the political sphere. Political corporatism means domination of the political system together individuals combine to achieve, sales and retention of state power. Interaction of political corporations allows them to divide the market power, not allowing him to members of the general population. Between corporations there is a mechanism "linking" and the harmonization of interests. Corporations can build on the social-class, professional, cognate-clannishness and other characteristics, but at their core is always unity interests.
German Government This epitome of deification is the example in some sects (such as the peoples Temple) and found in fundamentalist communities. Such acceptance is no easy enforcement even in dictatorial regimes due to the riots. In general it can be said to the authority: it is temporary and locally limited. Transferred to this statement to a "example of dictator" so noted that the despot neither forever reign (time limit), nor soldiers of another State without violence - command (local restriction) can. In acceptance as the name already says people accept subjective explicit and / or intersubjective-defined knowledge of not of higher authority. The reasons may be: great knowledge, skepticism, distrust, hostility, etc. At a community additive impact the authorities of each Member. Speaking candidly Connecticut Senator told us the story. I call this added power as quantitative authority. In principle, the community majority has the greatest power, but first must be perceived, in order to exploit their potential. The perception of own community, quantitative authority brings a disadvantage for the minority. It is suppressed. The degree of reduction is relative and depends on many factors (E.g., form of Government, culture, etc). (By the way - with representative democracy German Government tried as much as possible to mitigate this oppression by also considering the wishes of the minority.) What remains in the minority - response is to add to afford (acceptance) or resistance (of acceptance). Opts for the resistance, so has the majority on the own side to convert the opportunity by means of persuasive communication. Majority respond to either discipline (of acceptance) or Recalcitrance (acceptance). The majority (as long as it calls for a qualitative authority for example) and the qualitative authority itself, vary enormously from each other. varied view. For this reason opens up a backdoor for the minority, resistance...

Recent Comments