Second World War For this type of state Hobles arises between the sum of private interests and the basis of the property, there is no difference between public and private spheres, since the latter are permanent conflict without the state. Liberal state: the movement understand the questioning of absolute power and his divine claims, seeks to restrict the powers of state and defend the values of tolerance, defended life, private property and competitive market. The bourgeoisie accepted in first extent believed necessary to defend its economic interests, but begin to vary their position to the extent that some policies as mercantilism put obstacles to market development. A central feature of the liberal state is the fact that the actions of it is controlled by law. From this state comes the new state-society before capitalism was membership of legal and political. Welfare State: The origin of the EB will find it in the nineteenth century when you start to see a free market we can locate the historical origin of EB in Germany. Aimed to provide security for more protected areas. The EK (a Keynesian) arises from the crisis of 30 and developed after the Second World War. Arguably, the Keynesianism came to fill in empty space. The EBK (Keynesian form taken by the EB from 30) means that the end of Laissez Faire policies and the creation of a mixed economy in which the logic of the market and individual gain was modest. From the 70 starts to become evident crisis EB: Indicators economic start to show a decline in productivity.
National Convention Then read the letter from the defenders of the King, not provides further arguments. The result of counting of votes is known. It is Vergniaud which is responsible for notifying the decision: "The absolute majority is 361 votes in favor of the absent members and those declared disabled. 366 voted for death!" I declare, therefore, on behalf of the National Convention that the penalty taken by it against Louis Capet is death. " Louis, is convicted, thus, by a majority of just five votes, which means that very likely, if the vote has been done in other circumstances, Luis had been sentenced to the maximum penalty of banishment. Luis advocates are then allowed to express their opinions. Sze reads a statement written by Luis at Temple and is dated January 16: "I owe to my family and my honor to enter into a trial blames me a crime that I have to reproach myself. Therefore I appeal to declare the nation itself the decision of their representatives. " Sze takes up the floor to confirm what is said in the letter and remind the Assembly that it is their duty to discuss and not dismiss the appeal of the convicted person as required by the natural law, especially when the decision was adopted by a majority so weak. Tronchet, another supporter of Louis, said that in professional conviction requires a two thirds majority. Malesherbes, also tries to speak to defend Luis. Trembles with emotion, his voice fails. It ends by asking to be let speak the next day to make some observations.

Recent Comments